|
Market
Leadership Should Be A Top Priority For Technology Companies
Setting a goal of market
leadership for your high tech company would seem to be obvious,
wouldn't it? Unfortunately
it's not. Companies often dismiss market leadership as a serious
objective, viewing it instead as unrealistic or simply unattainable.
Many executives hold the notion that carving out little pieces of
multiple markets is just as good as owning the lion’s share of a
single one, provided both approaches bring in equivalent revenue.
Plus, the rationale goes, it's much easier being a
second-tier player filling excess customer demand created – and
paid for – by the leader. You’re
not dependent on any single market.
And you’re too small in any single one to be noticed, or at
least taken as a threat, by the competition.
Leaders love that attitude in their competitors.
They know firsthand that while it may work in commodity
markets such as computer monitors or memory chips, it ensures less
profitable second-class citizenship in dynamic, considered-purchase
technology markets such as application software or network
switching. Think of
technology leaders such as Microsoft, Intel, Sun and Oracle.
All four compete against companies with certain technologies
and products that arguably are superior to theirs.
Yet each exploits its dominant leadership position to sustain
market leverage over those competitors.
Indeed, being the market leader carries many more benefits than
just prestige and a bigger share than the competition.
Look at a few. First, market-leading products command premium price margins
(such as new generations of Intel's Pentium™ processor). Likewise, cost of sales of leading products, thanks largely
to heavy pull-through demand, will usually be lowest within their
categories. With such
ready demand, leaders can exact the most favorable distribution
terms (such as minimal price discounting to the sales channel) since
their products are easy to sell. A
leader's product life cycles tend to be longer as well
(Microsoft Works™ may be old, but still generates huge
revenues).
Leadership makes the future brighter too.
Emerging companies all want to work and ally with leaders,
offering them essentially "free" third-party support. Such
clout also gives leaders early, often exclusive access to new
technologies and decision makers.
Recruiting is much easier as well, since people want to work
for market leaders. Still another advantage is the huge amount of
publicity and ready public forum that go with being the market trend
setter and news maker. Furthermore,
leaders command maximum customer loyalty. The
list of benefits goes on and on.
But is leadership in technology markets really realistic,
especially for a small, fledgling company? Yes, provided it focuses on a discrete, well-understood (and
thus usually small) piece of the market for which it can provide a
competitively superior, compelling solution.
Getting there, of course, is all about market segmentation,
an arduous but necessary process for building a successful
technology business, especially in new and/or rapidly changing
markets
The process of market segmentation usually evokes grimaces from
those who have tackled it in the past. The reason, notes well-known business author Geoff Moore, is
that it's a "high risk, low data decision." That's because technology company management teams, while
knowing their particular technologies thoroughly, usually know very
little about the seemingly infinite numbers of potential target
customers and applications from which they must choose.
This lack of domain knowledge makes deciding which market
segments to pursue difficult , and which not to pursue almost
painful. Complicating
matters, single segments often appear too small to support the
company or to satisfy investor requirements for growth.
Market segmentation, while difficult, is
nothing less than essential for technology companies.
A manageable, stepwise process to address it will be
discussed in a future issue.
by James R. Helbig as published in ICCB
9/12/2000 |