|
Approach Market Segmentation The
Customer-Driven Way
Most of the business world embraces the
concept of market segmentation, the strategy of identifying and
targeting the best, most promising parts of your general market.
That, of course, implies choices.
But rather than make the painful, exclusionary choices regarding
which market segments not to pursue in favor of which ones to
pursue, managers often throw up their hands and nominally pursue
them all, rationalizing that the most promising ones will emerge on
their own. That,
however, is a formula for disaster.
The last thing emerging companies need to do is to dilute
finite resources of time and money by chasing widely divergent
market opportunities. Not
only is that trying to be all things to all people, but then
everyone seems to be a competitor as well.
Recognizing that market segmentation
means making tough decisions is a first step.
But making them correctly is just as important.
Many business people err by using the wrong criteria or
variables to select and define which segments of the market they
want to address. The
most visible, convenient variables, such as geography, demographics
or distribution channels for example, are seldom the best to use. Employing
a customer-driven approach to select target market segments is not
only better, it's simpler.
The approach is straightforward: Create and validate a value proposition for your product or
service that constitutes a compelling reason for customers to buy
it. "Compelling"
here simply means a "must have" condition where the
customer recognizes and receives truly strategic benefits that can
be achieved with no other competitive product or service.
"Must have" is critical.
If the customer does not sense a compelling reason to buy
your product, no amount of promotion, attractive design, price
discounting or other tactics will make it successful in a
non-commodity, considered-purchase marketplace.
Just three basic variables determine the strength of your value
proposition, and indeed define a market segment:
your product or service, the end-user customer (who will
actually use it), and the application (how or for what will it be
used). Varying any one
of these factors, such as changing product attributes, changes the
value proposition and market segment.
Meanwhile all other variables, from fit with your business
and available resources to the size of the segment itself, are
secondary here, even though they ultimately will become critical
aspects of your overall market strategy.
Let's frame this discussion of market segmentation in the context
of a stepwise process. First,
if you haven't done so, specifically define the product, including
only bundled features and options.
Fuzzy product concepts yield fuzzy, unreliable results.
Second, explore possible combinations of specific end users
and applications for the product.
Using simple judgement and intuition, identify promising
combinations which deserve further, in-depth consideration.
Third, use "application scenarios" to characterize
these promising segments. Understand
how and why various end-user customers would actually use the
product or service for real-life applications or problems, and with
what benefits and other implications.
Expect to require additional information or even "domain
experts" to fill knowledge gaps.
Fourth, rank the combinations according to the strength of
their value propositions, considering only "must have"
scenarios as finalists.
Fifth, shape and prioritize target segments according
to all the other classic segmentation variables -- target customer
accessibility, your market presence/credibility, strength of
competing alternatives, etc. Sixth,
use market research to test and validate the top segmentation
options identified. Finally,
create a "domino strategy" to capture similar, adjoining
segments sequentially once your market beachhead is established.
Throughout
this process the key ingredient to success is relevant, reliable
information. And that
leads directly to market research, the subject of next month's
column.
by James R. Helbig as published in ICCB
9/19/2000 |